2020 Jan 30, 8:39am
1,065 views 53 comments
Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last »
Wherever you copy/pasted this from made up their own intent and even legislation number. The proposed measure corrects a conservative "zero tolerance" measure that removes a judge's discrimination from individual cases and imposes penalties without regard to the specifics of each case. This is the same draconian puritanism that gets people placed on sex offender registrries for needing to pee in the bushes beside the road.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a person convicted of a violation of subdivision (b) of Section 286, subdivision (b) of Section 287, or subdivision (h) or (i) of Section 289 shall not be required to register if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth, and the conviction is the only one requiring the person to register. This paragraph does not preclude the court from requiring a person to register pursuant to Section 290.006.
There is no mention of an age limit:
That's because age limits are enshrined elsewhere within the code. This amendment ends the practice of treating same sex acts differently from hetero acts. Also you didn't seem to read down to 290.006 which you even quoted. The amendment doesn't prevent people from being required to register WHEN a judge determines it's appropriate, rather it takes away the automatic sentencing aspect.Let me ask you this: How do you feel about gun laws written by people who personally hate guns?
Your honor, I recognize the victim was 11 years old but WOW! he had the lithe WANTON! body of a 3 year old! WOW! You have to understand!
Conflating rape with consensual sex? You're worthless at discussing the topic. Fuck off out of here with your zero tolerance BS, how is this your position any different from treating biting a pop-tart into the shape of a gun the same as bringing an actual gun to school?
I know you are joking, but there is a Florida judge awhile back who threw out a case involving a 10 year old girl because the 10 year old was "acting sexy."
@NoCoupForYou Sorry, accidentally hit "dislike" on your post. Should have let my hands warm up before clicking.
ridiculous distances they go to defend faggots.
But the LGBTQ+P lobby in California got a law passed where knowingly passing HIV - an incurable, life shortening, deadly disease - without consent or knowledge of a person is decriminalized.
Are you gay? You defend those perverts really heavily.
Straight but not narrow.
You're dodging my questions. If the law punishes gay couples the same as straight couples, would you be OK with that?
The risk of HIV transmission during anal intercourse may be around 18 times greater than during vaginal intercourse, according to the results of a meta-analysis published online ahead of print in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
Loser Liberals won’t do anything until lgbts rape their kids in middle school and get away with it.
HeadSet says@NoCoupForYou Sorry, accidentally hit "dislike" on your post. Should have let my hands warm up before clicking.you can unclick it now
Still dodging the questions. Are you in favor of making and enforcing "anti-pedophilia" laws with the same standards and punishments whether the people involved are gay or straight?
This is new CA where by virtue of butt fucking one can commit crimes.
So, if you are a regular fucking white male (or for that matter black male or female, or whatever), you have to be checked and rechecked, and undergo trainings. If you are a transgendered sex offender, all is fine and these requirements are waived. This is quite interesting and seems to support NoCoup's idea that something is brewing behind the curtain.
proposed laws mandating quartering of pedophiles in upper middle class homesUnless the pedos are also soldiers, because mandatory quartering of soldiers violates the Third Amendment.
Fortwaynemobile saysThis is new CA where by virtue of butt fucking one can commit crimes.Your answer to this speaks to the origins and depth of your engagement in this issue. Are you in favor of making and enforcing "anti-pedophilia" laws with the same standards and punishments whether the people involved are gay or straight?
Minor Attracted Persons, the new PC/SJW term for Pedos
Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last »