Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

2
1

Even NASA knows the truth about global warming

By Onvacation follow Onvacation   2019 Nov 1, 6:22am 142 views   10 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity. But, again, this information has yet to go mainstream, some 19 years later, which is why deranged, climate-obsessed leftists have now begun to claim that we really only have 18 months left before the planet dies from an excess of carbon dioxide (CO2).
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-30-nasa-admits-climate-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html?fbclid=IwAR3kjBBGogkgmc6tT9QQW2uZQ1WwuiKCTndfLXIIqezJyzK2vFetqtoaYvg
1   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Nov 1, 6:40am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Yes, but that is not the point of AGW.

If the AGW folks really believed what they spout, they would be eager to work with people who do not believe in AGW but do recognize pollution and resource depletion as serious problems. After all, renewable energy like wind, solar, geo-thermal, and better nuclear power address both pollution and any AGW. However, the most effective approach would be to limit 1st World population to a renewable resource sustainable level. But that last point is the rub. The AGW crowd does not want any solutions other them vote Democrat, and Democrats are also for unfettered illegal immigration. Notice that all proponents of AGW on this blog can be distilled into these two strategies: Always keep the issue to arguing with deniers, and never talk about solutions other than vote Democrat.
2   Onvacation   ignore (6)   2019 Nov 1, 6:46am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

" In what obviously came as a shock to many, the Senate recently voted on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) so-called “Green New Deal,” and wouldn’t you know it – not a single member of Congress, including Democrats, voted in favor of it.

With a final vote of 0-57, with all 43 Democrats simply voting “present,” the cow fart-banning, fossil fuel-eradicating, economy-destroying socialist mess was finally put to rest – much to the chagrin of AOC, who almost immediately chastised all of her colleagues for not supporting her pipe dream legislation."
3   NoCoupForYou   ignore (5)   2019 Nov 1, 7:13am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If Global Warming was real, property insurers would have maps and assessments of where flood zones would spread to if the sea level rose a few inches or percipitation increased and be charging homeowners in those areas considerably higher premiums. They would have long since lobbied state regulators to charge these adjustments and areas to avoid would become public knowledge. Banks would begin to require this insurance for new loans made in these future at-risk areas, marking up PITI accordingly.
4   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (3)   2019 Nov 1, 7:19am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

GW people don't notice the giant fucking sun in the sky that warms planet up, and how we get fucking ice frozen when it doesn't shine overnight.
5   rocketjoe79   ignore (2)   2019 Nov 1, 10:14am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Onvacation says
" In what obviously came as a shock to many, the Senate recently voted on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) so-called “Green New Deal,” and wouldn’t you know it – not a single member of Congress, including Democrats, voted in favor of it.

With a final vote of 0-57, with all 43 Democrats simply voting “present,” the cow fart-banning, fossil fuel-eradicating, economy-destroying socialist mess was finally put to rest – much to the chagrin of AOC, who almost immediately chastised all of her colleagues for not supporting her pipe dream legislation."


That was back in March 2019. But Still, didn't make much mainstream press coverage. Funny, right?
6   offendedsnowflake   ignore (0)   2019 Nov 1, 10:59am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
Yes, but that is not the point of AGW.

If the AGW folks really believed what they spout, they would be eager to work with people who do not believe in AGW but do recognize pollution and resource depletion as serious problems. After all, renewable energy like wind, solar, geo-thermal, and better nuclear power address both pollution and any AGW. However, the most effective approach would be to limit 1st World population to a renewable resource sustainable level. But that last point is the rub. The AGW crowd does not want any solutions other them vote Democrat, and Democrats are also for unfettered illegal immigration. Notice that all proponents of AGW on this blog can be distilled into these two strategies: Always keep the issue to arguing with deniers, and never talk about solutions other than vote Democrat.


Except renewables won't work and are actually worse for the environment. Michael Shellenberger lays it out here: https://quillette.com/2019/02/27/why-renewables-cant-save-the-planet/
7   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2019 Nov 1, 11:52am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

offendedsnowflake says
Except renewables won't work and are actually worse for the environment.

Renewables prices will continue to fall, including batteries. All houses & cars will be equipped soon (10-20 yrs). If the worse problem is that the sun doesn't shine all the time everywhere... well, it does shine quite often in the US south. So we can start there.
We may need a bit of nuclear, but how much nuclear fuel is out there? How long would it last if all nations were using it like France?
How long will oil last for that matter?
Anyway we put it, we need as much renewable as we can get. This civilization will not last long without a new energy sourcing.
8   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Nov 1, 12:28pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Except renewables won't work

That will be a gradual process. Some scientist, inventor or company somewhere will improve on renewables, or even invent new techniques to improve sustainability. In the meantime, we just need to keep the 1st world population at a level sustainable by these improvements. This population has stabilized naturally, but so may 1st world governments have the insane idea that population must always grow, and are thus swamping the 1st World countries with 3rd world immigrants.
9   NoCoupForYou   ignore (5)   2019 Nov 1, 12:35pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Renewables prices will continue to fall, including batteries.


Batteries, esp high capacity ones, are extremely extremely polluting.
10   HeadSet   ignore (3)   2019 Nov 1, 12:40pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Batteries, esp high capacity ones, are extremely extremely polluting

Do not Prius batteries last 10 years in the car? And even at end of life can be recycled. At that is with today's technology. They will be improved.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions