« prev   random   next »

1
1

Man wins women’s world championship cycling competition

By Shaman follow Shaman   2019 Oct 22, 5:17am 493 views   29 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


And he calls everyone who objects “LOSERS.”
Stay classy, trannies!
This is a little appetizer for the 2020 Summer Olympics. It’s going to be a shit show, folks!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/transgender-cyclist-wins-female-cycling-140751978.html
1   zzyzzx   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 6:25am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

HONK HONK!!!
2   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostakovitch   ignore (55)   2019 Oct 22, 7:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

WHAT A CUNT!

All that muscle mass in the legs and ass didn't come from anywhere but a testosterone rich physiology that McKinnon likely still maintains in excess of his naturally developed competitors, albeit at a lower level if he's taking suppressors.

Fuckface knows this.

McKinnon should have his own category: IGNORANT! FUCKING! CUNT!
3   NDrLoR   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 8:34am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
All that muscle mass in the legs and ass
Yes, look at his ass compared to that fat child-bearing ass in the background and you can easily see the difference.
5   socal2   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 9:34am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Nancy Pelosi and the retarded US Democrats in Congress have passed a bill allowing men to participate in women's sports.
6   truthhurts   ignore (0)   2019 Oct 22, 9:55am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

It's hilarious how liberals are undermining the entire professional women's sports movement with this tranny shit.

At the end of the day, all these athletic associations are businesses trying to make money. This man winning the women's cycle championship is going to turn off a lot of fans. The purses will become smaller and athletes are going to become pissed. Liberalism is an evolutionary dead end. I just wish I could fast forward a hundred years so I don't have to live through all this crap.
7   NancyPelosiHaircut   ignore (4)   2019 Oct 22, 10:45am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

socal2 says
Nancy Pelosi and the retarded US Democrats in Congress have passed a bill allowing men to participate in women's sports.


Did this pass during Obama era? I'm sure Trump would veto some shit like that.
8   NancyPelosiHaircut   ignore (4)   2019 Oct 22, 10:46am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

truthhurts says
It's hilarious how liberals are undermining the entire professional women's sports movement with this tranny shit.

At the end of the day, all these athletic associations are businesses trying to make money. This man winning the women's cycle championship is going to turn off a lot of fans. The purses will become smaller and athletes are going to become pissed. Liberalism is an evolutionary dead end. I just wish I could fast forward a hundred years so I don't have to live through all this crap.


There are no guarantees shit won't be worse in 100 years.
Seems like retards get into power every few years and start inventing problems -> society eventually gets more conservative and fixes some of them -> retards regain power and start bringing problems back -> repeat....
9   richwicks   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 11:15am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

socal2 says
Nancy Pelosi and the retarded US Democrats in Congress have passed a bill allowing men to participate in women's sports.


Name the bill, and link to it - or I call bullshit. Ever wonder why journalists avoid liking to direct information so you can verify their story is indeed true?

Because most of the time, they're just fucking lying.
10   Onvacation   ignore (6)   2019 Oct 22, 11:20am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

"The ceiling for women's testosterone levels (2.4 nanomoles per liter (npl)) does not even reach the floor for men's testosterone levels (10 npl). Some transgender athletes say female athletes should just try harder, but no amount of trying harder will overcome the huge advantage of testosterone.

We should treat people suffering gender dysphoria with compassion and respect. But that doesn't mean legislators should pass laws that put female athletes at such a disadvantage."
11   RC2006   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 11:23am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
socal2 says
Nancy Pelosi and the retarded US Democrats in Congress have passed a bill allowing men to participate in women's sports.


Name the bill, and link to it - or I call bullshit. Ever wonder why journalists avoid liking to direct information so you can verify their story is indeed true?

Because most of the time, they're just fucking lying.


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/17/lgbtq-anti-discrimination-legislation-1452388

"The House passed a bill Friday, 236-173, extending federal anti-discrimination protections to LGBTQ Americans."
12   Shaman   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 11:26am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

@richwicks
This is it, although it was DOA in the Senate. Thankfully! This bill is integral to the pedo-domination of the USA. Note that it declares sexual orientation to be a protected class and gives such people extra rights. The next very small step is to declare pedophilia a sexual orientation. Then they are protected from discrimination and eventually prosecution.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/17/house-equality-act-transgender-womens-sports/
13   richwicks   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 11:32am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

RC2006 says
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/17/lgbtq-anti-discrimination-legislation-1452388

"The House passed a bill Friday, 236-173, extending federal anti-discrimination protections to LGBTQ Americans."


Like this: this is the roll call: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll217.xml

That's "H R 5"

The text of the bill is:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5/text

Ignore journalists. There are no journalists in the United States today, they are propagandists.

It's not been passed on to the Senate. I'm serious, entirely ignore "mainstream press" unless they are pointing out to specific provisions of the bill. Quotes from supposed lawmakers are worthless and insincere. If they actually had a stance, they would directly address it.
15   socal2   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 11:48am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
It's not been passed on to the Senate. I'm serious, entirely ignore "mainstream press" unless they are pointing out to specific provisions of the bill. Quotes from supposed lawmakers are worthless and insincere. If they actually had a stance, they would directly address it.


What are you even arguing?

Are you disputing the fact that the Democrats in the House passed a bill that would allow dudes to compete in women's sports?
16   RC2006   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 11:53am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

socal2 says
richwicks says
It's not been passed on to the Senate. I'm serious, entirely ignore "mainstream press" unless they are pointing out to specific provisions of the bill. Quotes from supposed lawmakers are worthless and insincere. If they actually had a stance, they would directly address it.


What are you even arguing?

Are you disputing the fact that the Democrats in the House passed a bill that would allow dudes to compete in women's sports?


This is all 100% Democrats doing, or liberals that run these organizations nothing else really to say about it.
17   richwicks   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 12:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

socal2 says
Are you disputing the fact that the Democrats in the House passed a bill that would allow dudes to compete in women's sports?


I'm saying read the bill. The claim that was made was:

"Nancy Pelosi and the retarded US Democrats in Congress have passed a bill allowing men to participate in women's sports."

Well, here's the text of the bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5/text

Do a search for "sports" or "athlete". Notice it doesn't show up. Could have missed a term though I admit, but I don't like to spend too much time checking a claim.

Look, I'm not trying to bust balls or embarrass people. My hobby is the study of dissemination and the mechanism of propaganda. I'm trying to show everybody how it works, and how subtle it is. It's entirely believable that Pelosi WOULD do this, and people SUPPOSEDLY in the news will claim it, but I always go to a source, because I'm tired of propaganda.

I just ignore everything from a journalist, and at the MOST I'll take it with a grain of salt and I later find out if it's true. If you actually start to go through the tedium of checking sources, you're going to be shocked that 90% of what you are told, is bullshit. You are lied to all the time, but so is everybody. We're all subject to it, and we're all victims of it. I'm still a victim of it frequently although I understand how it works precisely.

Edward Bernays sure was a fucking bastard. Well, there's a million people JUST LIKE HIM now who really believe they are doing the "right thing" to lie to you, because you're too dumb to form an opinion. I'd say an incorrect opinion is a lot better than a belief you mistake for an opinion.
18   socal2   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 12:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
Do a search for "sports" or "athlete". Notice it doesn't show up. Could have missed a term though I admit, but I don't like to spend too much time checking a claim.


The bill turns sexual orientation and GENDER IDENTITY into protected classes.

So pretty much anything goes now (if passed by the Senate).

There is no provision in the bill protecting women's sports from dudes competing in them.

Republicans explicitly complained about women's sports being ruined by this law when it was up for debate and the Democrats and their Media lapdogs all poo-pooed the concern. Here are some media reports basically mocking the Republican's concern over this issue:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/dominicholden/house-passes-equality-act-lgbt-rights-discrimination
https://time.com/5562916/sports-house-hearing-lgbt-rights-bill/
19   socal2   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 12:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

BTW - when the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage, I doubt there was any explicit language stating that wedding photographers and cake-bakers could lose their businesses and face major fines if they refused to participate in a gay wedding.

But here we are in 2019 with people losing their businesses and having to fight it out all the way to the Supreme Court.
20   richwicks   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 22, 12:55pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

socal2 says

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/dominicholden/house-passes-equality-act-lgbt-rights-discrimination
https://time.com/5562916/sports-house-hearing-lgbt-rights-bill/


Haha, I give up. People can't be made to be not gullible. Buzzfeednews and time.com are TWWUUEEE!

You wanted this:

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/116th-congress/house-report/56/1

3. An amendment by Mr. Steube to add a rule of construction
providing that nothing in the Act or any amendment made by it
may be construed to require a biological female to face
competition from a biological male in any sporting event was
defeated by a rollcall vote of 10 to 22.

That's all I could find. Funny buzzfuck and weshoulddojailtime can't give you original sources. Guess there's not enough space on THEIR internet to give you a link. Too bad you won't look them up either. I did my duty. I'll let you go back to mindlessly reporting stuff as it's absolutely true from propagandists that do a worse job than I do in proving their point than I do, even though I'm not a journalist, and their entire job IS research.

I told you, I was trying to get people to think. Well, fuck it.
21   socal2   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 22, 1:03pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
3. An amendment by Mr. Steube to add a rule of construction
providing that nothing in the Act or any amendment made by it
may be construed to require a biological female to face
competition from a biological male in any sporting event was
defeated by a rollcall vote of 10 to 22.

That's all I could find.


That's all you need.

The bill doesn't allow for a carve out (proposed by a Republican Greg Stuebe) to protect women sports from men who identify as women.
22   NancyPelosiHaircut   ignore (4)   2019 Oct 22, 1:36pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I'm sure all the Feminists who supported all this leftist shit are now wondering for themselves WTF did they create?
That's a problem with stupid people, results are always shit.
23   clambo   ignore (5)   2019 Oct 22, 1:47pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

They must change the rules:

If you have XY chromosomes, you can't compete with the women and girls.

Only having XX chromosomes should qualify.

Outward female appearance wouldn't matter.
24   Fuckyouasshole   ignore (1)   2019 Oct 23, 10:27am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

I can't wait for NBA rejects to go to the WNBA and destroy the competition. Dudes would score 100 points without breaking a sweat
25   richwicks   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 23, 10:34am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

clambo says
If you have XY chromosomes, you can't compete with the women and girls.

Only having XX chromosomes should qualify.


You'll eliminate a ton of women who have androgen immunity disorder, or AIS. There are disproportionate number of them in sports and in modelling.

They are XY, but they have grown up as women and have always thought of themselves as women. it's not as simple as you imagine.

However, cutting off your junk, and then taking estrogen injections - that's a bit of a stretch for most people..
26   Ceffer   ignore (4)   2019 Oct 23, 11:24am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

Heh, Heh! They need another category of 'Ballsack Bitches' to accommodate the gender dysphoric. No steroid testing necessary because fake bitches.
27   truthhurts   ignore (0)   2019 Oct 23, 12:02pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

richwicks says
You'll eliminate a ton of women who have androgen immunity disorder


Uhh, a "ton"? Quick Wikipedia search says it's prevalence is around 1 in 100,000. So we're talking about maybe 35,000 females out of 3.5 billion have this disorder. So what percentage of female athletes would actually have to deal with this? Like 2 maybe? Why not just make sensible rules then grant exceptions when we need to?
28   HeadSet   ignore (2)   2019 Oct 23, 12:39pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

FortWayneIndiana says
I'm sure all the Feminists who supported all this leftist shit are now wondering for themselves WTF did they create?
That's a problem with stupid people, results are always shit.


Or:

The feminists are fat slobs left out of sports anyway, and do not mind that women's sports are wrecked.
29   komputodo   ignore (3)   2019 Oct 23, 1:04pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag      

FortWayneIndiana says
I'm sure all the Feminists who supported all this leftist shit are now wondering for themselves WTF did they create?
That's a problem with stupid people, results are always shit.
That would require that they can think.....Personally, I think the results of this are great...

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions