2018 Aug 14, 11:29pm
3,063 views 20 comments
Also, this assumes that CO2 causes global warming.
These and other ideas in geo-engineering can make sense, unlike transferring $$$ to backwards kleptocracies in the southern hemisphere.
HeadSet saysAlso, this assumes that CO2 causes global warming.Dude. Dude.
unlike transferring $$$ to backwards kleptocracies in the southern hemisphere.
So why no talk about a "Hydro footprint." Why just panic about carbon?
Answer this, water vapor is said by these same climate scientists to be a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. But burning any hydrocarbon produces not just the CO2, but creates water vapor as well.
Also assumes we want a colder planet instead of a warmer one.
I thought capturing carbon is to allow burning oil and transferring $$$ to countries like Saudi Arabia....
Geo-engineering is about managing the climate. CO2 capture is one proposal to manage the climate.Whether you choose to burn coal, gas, oil, or nothing at all is an energy choice. These are different choices on different menus.
Are you advocating taking Saudis oil? Or burning coal?
"A Cheap Trick Enables Energy-Efficient Carbon CaptureUsing lime to scrub carbon dioxide from power plant smokestacks could cut emissions efficiently and cheaply."