Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

2
2

Mueller details the Russian hacking

By Tim Aurora follow Tim Aurora   2018 Jul 14, 6:22am 7,840 views   60 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening,” he said at a news conference at one of his resorts, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”

That same day, July 27, several Russian government hackers launched an attack against the email accounts of staffers in Clinton’s personal office, according to a sweeping indictment Friday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. At or around the same time, the hackers also targeted 76 email addresses used by the Clinton campaign, investigators said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-the-russians-hacked-the-dnc-and-passed-its-emails-to-wikileaks/2018/07/13/af19a828-86c3-11e8-8553-a3ce89036c78_story.html?utm_term=.3135d4fb62a7

« First    « Previous    Comments 21 - 60 of 60    Last »

21   Shaman   ignore (3)   2018 Jul 15, 7:45am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
I think if Hillary had even done a tenth of this, she would have been fried.


Hillary’s campaign actually colluded with Russian intelligence agents to create opposition research, worked with the FBI and Obama to spy on the Trump campaign, as well as being extremely negligent with Top Secret material and letting the Russians hack it. Oh and she took bribes while SoS to sell American Uranium supplies to Russia.
She wasn’t prosecuted because the FBI was probably biased, corrupted, and gave her a total pass on everything.
This doesn’t even include the less probable but seriously probably accusations of money laundering, charity abuse, taking of foreign bribes, and orchestrated murder of people who could rat her out.
She’s the most corrupt politician of our time by FAR, and this is why she failed to win a fully rigged election.
22   MisterLefty   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 15, 8:08am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
* Russians ( see above ) being indicted for interfering and by name.

Collusion is the witch hunt. Are you aware the USA is doing the same things and worse around the world?
23   mell   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 15, 8:14am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MisterLefty says
Tim Aurora says
* Russians ( see above ) being indicted for interfering and by name.

Collusion is the witch hunt. Are you aware the USA is doing the same things and worse around the world?


Exactly. Especially the "hacking" or "disinformation" accusations. I mean WTF, suddenly Russia has become a genius and is the only country that has legit hackers and information/propaganda programs? Pretty sure the GRU is telling Mueller to fuck off as they should. What a buffoon.
24   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2018 Jul 15, 9:04am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Instead of treating Sanders as a viable candidate for the Democratic ticket, the DNC worked against him and his campaign to ensure Clinton received the nomination. ..


That Idiot Cucked his own campaign. Right from the start he was in cahoots with the BLM movement. Remember his first rally he (most likely invited) allowed them to come stage commandeer his mic then shit on whitey?
His whole campaign was about him sucking some other political moment's Dick.
The way he kissed Hillary's ass in the few debates they had. Agreed with Hillary even when Hillary was insulting his bid for office.

I think what ever his purpose was in the 2016 elections he got an Audi Super Sports car out of the deal.
25   just_dregalicious   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 15, 12:31pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
Ah , we are bad so if our enemies punch us they are justified .


Have you ever tried wearing a hair shirt? You might like it.
26   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 15, 1:18pm     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
it is like in olden days, traitors would invite rival kings to attack their kingdom in the hopes of being a proxy ruler.


I want mainly to preserve that comment. I will reply, but I doubt replying will persuade anyone.

The Clintonistas did seem to expect a coronation, an orderly succession like "in olden days," and reacted with extreme hostility to any challenge. Some of my older friends IRL, who supported Hillary, hated Bernie for challenging her. Every time he criticized her, no matter how fairly or accurately, they warned those criticisms would hurt her chances in the general election. Nevermind that polls ranked him #1, ahead of both Donald and Hillary; Clintonistas insisted that only HIllary could win.

When she lost, they looked for someone else to blame, and that became Russia. Nevermind that she had outspent the Republicans 2:1, and Russia by orders of magnitude. Nevermind that she had tremendous backing from her Saudi clients and their MSM mouthpieces. Nevermind that she polled initially ahead, until people saw more of her record (trade deals, her disastrous war in Libya, expanding it into Syria, arming Sunni militias including ultimately al Qaeda, etc.) She called TPP "the gold standard" and then denied saying that. Donald Trump quoted her saying it, and she accused him of making it up, even though the NY Times had reported it when she said it. She took credit for her war in Libya which exploded horribly, as Donald Trump and Jill Stein pointed out. She campaigned on escalating her disastrous MENA war, vowing to shoot down Russian planes literally within seconds flying time of Armageddon, and one of her proxies said we must kill Russians on the ground in Syria too, and she wanted to import 60k Syrian Sunnis per year, with credible estimates saying 2% would be ISIL, and 20% would call ISIL "a positive influence". That's 1k ISIL terrorists per year, imported into the USA at American expense on behalf of her Saudi clients. After the Islamic attack on Orlando Pulse, where 50 people were murdered and another 50 wounded, she campaigned in Florida with the murderer's father standing literally right behind her holding up a banner quoting the guy who said we should arm Sunni militias. Look also at Hillary's record in Latin America, where she took credit for 'managing the transition' (corporate coup) in Honduras, making that country the most dangerous in the world, with the highest homicide rates, as right wing death squads (including people trained by CIA) murder environmentalists on behalf of her corporate sponsors. Younger friends, including from Latin America, supported Bernie and/or Donald. Instead of reconsidering any part of the platform (e.g. spreading Islam), Democrats insist that her crown got "stolen" by Russia through no fault of her own.

They insist further that our country, i.e. the USA, which belongs equally to Donald and his voters as to Hillary and hers, got "attacked" by Russia. If America had been attacked by Russia, I think we would know. The DNC leaked, either due to outside hacking, or inside downloads by Imran Awan or the late Seth Rich or others. The DNC failed to protect its own IT, just as its nominee had failed to preserve properly her e-mails while at State, and the DNC refused to turn over its servers to the FBI. They could not even protect their own party, let alone a country. Anyone running a competent campaign in this era would anticipate spies, whether for journalists or rivals or foreign powers.

Lastly, since so many pols have or want their fingers in the KSA Petrodollar pie, the "investigation" must focus only on Russia, rather than interference in the election. If you care about foreign countries "attacking" our country's elections, then you should demand an impartial investigation of all foreign involvement, including KSA. Democrats do not demand that, because they do not care about that. They want only an excuse, to say Russia stole the election.

I don't personally know anyone who was "attacked" by Russia. America wasn't. Maybe the DNC was, allegedly, but the "attack" consisted of publishing e-mails that revealed what the DNC was actually saying.

Do you remember when Hillary couldn't find her missing billing records, and a housekeeper found them on the coffee table of the White House? Did that housekeeper "attack" our country by producing the records that Congress had requested?

Donald invited Russia to find Hillary's "missing" e-mails, the same way the housekeeper had found Hillary's missing billing records. Neither Donald nor the housekeeper "attacked our country" (let alone Hillary's Kingdom) by doing that. In both instances, branches of the the United States government had legally demanded those records and Hillary had said she could not find them. In both instances, producing the "missing" records would have been doing the USA a favor, though it would not have been to Hillary's advantage.

The Clintonistas seem not to realize that the USA is not Hillary's kingdom. Of the people who were eligible to vote for her in 2016, 70% (seventy percent!) chose not to. Outside California, she lost by a landslide. Inside California, her MSM campaign including scaring people with hallucinations of 'nuclear Hitler' got her enough votes to score a plurality of the popular vote, but not enough to win the election, so now Democrats demand NPVIC, which would automate the process of hacking elections. That shows Democrats do not even really care about hacking, either. They are simply looking for an excuse to explain why Hillary lost, anything that does not require anyone in the DNC to reconsider the platform (e.g. trade deals and spreading Islam) or the decision to crown Hillary as the nominee.

I predict some few Americans will get prosecuted, and Donald will pardon them, and Democrats will lose the midterms because they've been campaigning on nothing but Russia for more than a year and they will have nothing to show for it.

At this point, Clintonistas don't even want Democrats to win, and the Clintonistas continue to dominate the DNC. We end up with one-party government, which is terrible. In 2010, Democrats incurred the worst midterm loss of any party in more than 70 years, for reasons I have explained on PatNet, and Democrats have never recovered. Today, Republicans control all three branches of the federal government, plus most of the states. The Clintonistas don't really care, so long as the infinite subsidies keep flowing to their corporate sponsors. All else is theater, bread and circuses.
27   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Jul 15, 6:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
So if and when the proof is delivered,


When will that be??? It's been 2 YEARS already, does it really take 11 (or was it 14) intelligence agencies this long to find evidence?

Tim Aurora says
Russians ( see above ) being indicted for interfering and by name.


Exactly how did that affect the election results to help Trump? Hillary actually received MORE votes, so it wasn't vote tampering why she lost? Rosenstein even admitted that Friday.

Tim Aurora says
Numerous contacts with Russia and Trump campaign


Yes, wasn't that horrible how Flynn was doing his JOB as National Security Advisor, and contacting other countries.

Tim Aurora says
While there is no proof per se


Well, @Tim Aurora I'm glad to see you're finally admitting that, after 2 YEARS of investigations.
28   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 15, 6:11pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
If America had been attacked by Russia, I think we would know. The DNC leaked, either due to outside hacking, or inside downloads by Imran Awan or the late Seth Rich or others. The DNC failed to protect its own IT, just as its nominee had failed to preserve properly her e-mails while at State, and the DNC refused to turn over its servers to the FBI. They could not even protect their own party, let alone a country.


Lol, yes, it's not about America being attacked.

It's totally and only about the DNC's failure to protect its IT, and the fact that their failure exposed DNC corruption.
29   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Jul 15, 6:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Former CIA Officer: Clinton "Involved In Biggest Treason In History"

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says what Hillary Clinton did with her charity and Uranium One while she was Secretary of State was a crime for the history books. Shipp explains, “Hillary Clinton used this to launder money in foreign banks so it wasn’t subject to U.S. laws, congressional subpoenas or FOIA demands for the evidence. This was done to launder this money globally into the Clinton Foundation so the U.S. government could not examine it at all.”


Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller was the head of the FBI while the Uranium One deal was being done by Clinton and the Russians. One fifth of U.S. uranium production was bought by the Russians in a deal Clinton pushed and approved. The Clinton Foundation received more than $140 million from some of the same Russian players who were involved with Uranium One. Why didn’t Mueller stop the deal? Shipp says,

“Mueller is either a complete moron, which he is not, or he overlooked the biggest counterterrorism cases in U.S. history. It involved Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One and, of course, the destruction of all the emails and evidence and her secret server, and on and on and on it goes, and he (Mueller) ignored it all.”


Shipp also points out that, this time, it will not be business as usual for the “Deep State and Shadow Government.” They are going to be brought to justice because Shipp says, “indictments are coming because of Donald Trump coming into the White House from the outside. Trump cannot be bribed.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-15/former-cia-officer-clinton-involved-biggest-treason-history
30   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 15, 6:34pm     ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
The DNC failed to protect its own IT, just as its nominee had failed to preserve properly her e-mails while at State, and the DNC refused to turn over its servers to the FBI. They could not even protect their own party, let alone a country. Anyone running a competent campaign in this era would anticipate spies, whether for journalists or rivals or foreign powers.


That's funny, because it's known that the RNC was also hacked and Russia downloaded information from their server as well. They just didn't release it likely because they wanted Trump to win, and also to keep some blackmail material if he did.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/comey-republicans-hacked-russia/index.html

Not to mention the States voting registries that were hacked. Certainly, you would agree that a foreign State driven campaign to hack US voter registries is an attack on America.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/russians-penetrated-u-s-voter-systems-says-top-u-s-n845721

Patrick says
Lol, yes, it's not about America being attacked.

It's totally and only about the DNC's failure to protect its IT, and the fact that their failure exposed DNC corruption


And the RNC too, right?
31   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Jul 15, 7:16pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
That's funny, because it's known that the RNC was also hacked and Russia downloaded information from their server as well.


What's that got to do with Trump and Russian collusion?

LeonDurham says
Not to mention the States voting registries that were hacked.


What's that got to do with Trump and Russian collusion?

LeonDurham says
Certainly, you would agree that a foreign State driven campaign to hack US voter registries is an attack on America.


What's that got to do with Trump and Russian collusion?

LeonDurham says
And the RNC too, right?


What's that got to do with Trump and Russian collusion?
32   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 15, 11:29pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
Certainly, you would agree that a foreign State driven campaign to hack US voter registries is an attack on America.


No LeonDurham/JoeyJoeJoeJr/Tatupu70, and I see that you are trolling me again, but I will take a moment to explain a difference so obvious that even you should be able to see it.

As part of Hillary's War in Libya, the USA bombed and killed the people who wanted to make deals with NATO that would have enabled NATO to get more and cheaper oil and gas, competing with Hillary's Saudi clients. She claimed credit for that war and, if I may slightly paraphrase her: She came, she saw, they died. She had them killed, thus protecting her Saudi clients from Libyan competition. That was an attack, even though the administration denied any "hostilities."

As part of President Eisenhower's security strategy, the USA flew U2 spy planes over the USSR. Armed only with cameras, the U2 planes could merely photograph, not attack. As the name suggests, the U2 spy planes were spying, not attacking. Satellites do the same today.

Surely even you can see that difference. If anyone has fooled you into failing to see it, then you should not trust them, because they are using you as their fool. Russian hackers did allegedly spy on state systems, but did not damage them, unlike ISIL, which hijacked state systems and made them display pro-ISIL messages.

Since you have at last acknowledged the vulnerability of state election systems to hacking, perhaps you can now see that NPVIC is a dangerously bad idea. I cited examples of state systems getting hacked more than a year ago, including allegedly by Russia and evidently by the Islamic State. Nevertheless, Democrats have continued enacting NPVIC in blue jurisdictions. Surely now that even you acknowledge hacking at the state level, you can tell Democrats to repeal or replace NPVIC prior to the next Presidential election. Otherwise, they are practically begging to lose the next Presidential election to hacking by practically anyone.

BTW, you never got around to answering 2Scoops in the Abhulimen thread, where you were caught lying about the key card, which anyone can see in the linked video in that thread.

Meanwhile, here's Hillary on Kadaffy, set to music: "We came, we saw, he died." That's evidently what happens on her watch when someone tries to compete with her Saudi clients.
Hillary's War in Libya went on to kill tens of thousands of Libyans, and the expansion of the war into Syria (including arming Sunni militias) has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions, and all that is in addition to her continuous support for the war in Iraq, not to mention the bombing of Serbia to keep Bosnia Islamic (including Nazis) on behalf of her Saudi clients.
33   Tim Aurora   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 5:09am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Lol, yes, it's not about America being attacked.

It's totally and only about the DNC's failure to protect its IT, and the fact that their failure exposed DNC corruption.


So you would say the same thing if China attacked RNC or any other American institution ( actually they already did) . I am sure China is watching this very carefully and would not mind taking a side and make sure it can keep US as a vulnerable trading partner. They are definitly more smarter and richer than Russia and will not hesitate to rule the world. Then the choice for Americans would be, do you want to be Russian or Chinese bitch ( they would claim to be partners but in essence we would be bitches)
34   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 6:15am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
No LeonDurham/JoeyJoeJoeJr/Tatupu70, and I see that you are trolling me again


Pointing out the logical errors in your posting isn't trolling.

curious2 says
As part of Hillary's War in Libya, the USA bombed and killed the people who wanted to make deals with NATO that would have enabled NATO to get more and cheaper oil and gas, competing with Hillary's Saudi clients. She claimed credit for that war and, if I may slightly paraphrase her: She came, she saw, they died. She had them killed, thus protecting her Saudi clients from Libyan competition. That was an attack, even though the administration denied any "hostilities."


Not sure what you are trying to say here. Yes, that is another example of an attack.

curious2 says
As part of President Eisenhower's security strategy, the USA flew U2 spy planes over the USSR. Armed only with cameras, the U2 planes could merely photograph, not attack. As the name suggests, the U2 spy planes were spying, not attacking. Satellites do the same today.


That's funny, because the USSR certainly interpreted it as an attack. They defended themselves by shooting one of the planes down.

https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/u2-spy-incident

Too bad Trump is too weak to defend our country against similar attacks today.

curious2 says
Surely even you can see that difference


Sure--there is a difference, but the word attack encompasses many different forms of aggression. In this case, both qualify.

curious2 says
BTW, you never got around to answering 2Scoops in the Abhulimen thread, where you were caught lying about the key card, which anyone can see in the linked video in that thread.


Nope--no lies. I was (and still am) correct. Didn't feel the need to keep replying to the trolling over there. IDs aren't required to have pictures or addresses on them.
35   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 7:19am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
So you would say the same thing if China attacked RNC or any other American institution ( actually they already did) .


Sure, the RNC should also protect its own servers.

The RNC and the DNC are not the government. They are private groups of people who promote certain candidates for office.
36   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 7:39am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
The RNC and the DNC are not the government. They are private groups of people who promote certain candidates for office.


What about the many States that had their voter registries hacked? Those are government agencies.
37   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 7:41am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Lol, we were talking about the DNC's failure to hide its own corruption.
38   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 7:46am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Lol, we were talking about the DNC's failure to hide its own corruption.


Who's we?

The OP is about Russian hacking. Then some folks made comments about how it was the DNCs fault. I felt it appropriate to remind the Trump supporters that the RNC, various State databases, et. al were also attacked by the Russian State hackers as it pretty much kills that argument.
39   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 8:04am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The OP is explicitly and only about Hillary and the DNC.
40   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Jul 16, 8:10am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
The OP is about Russian hacking.


Do you know that for a fact, that it WAS the Russians?

Was the DNC server inspected by the FBI or CIA for evidence?

Was Hillary's server inspected by the FBI or CIA for evidence?

Was Hillary's campaign server inspected by the FBI or CIA for evidence?

Rosenstein said the word "allegation" multiple times in his presser. What's the definition of "allegation"?

We won't even touch on the FACT of idiot Podesta replying to a Phishing email and voluntarily giving his password on his Gmail account to some hacker.

41   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 8:11am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
The OP is explicitly and only about Hillary and the DNC.


No, it's about Mueller's indictments.
42   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 8:11am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MrMagic says
Do you know that for a fact, that it WAS the Russians?


Yep.
43   Shaman   ignore (3)   2018 Jul 16, 8:13am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
That's funny, because it's known that the RNC was also hacked and Russia downloaded information from their server as well. They just didn't release it


Because it was boring and didn’t contain anything the world would even care about.

If the Russians hacked the DNC, it’s like a thief breaking into your house and then leaving you a note that says your butter contains arsenic put there by your housekeeper.
It’s more of a favor than an outrage.
44   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 16, 8:40am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Unfortunately, we'll never know. More likely, the info was kept as blackmail material...
45   Tim Aurora   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 9:11am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
If the Russians hacked the DNC, it’s like a thief breaking into your house and then leaving you a note that says your butter contains arsenic put there by your housekeeper.
It’s more of a favor than an outrage


Ah the old favor done by the thief (Russia). We should allow this thief to look into all our US state secrets and tell us if they find anything wrong. Actually, Trump is on it. He did so with the Russian foreign minister in the white house and now more secrets given to Russia at the Helsinki summit. Russia will go through all this and then let the US know if it did anything wrong. Thank you Russia.
46   Tim Aurora   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 16, 9:58am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MisterLefty says
Collusion is the witch hunt. Are you aware the USA is doing the same things and worse around the world?


Ah, the old we are bad and did punch someone in our previous life, so if someone punches us , let us just take like Buddha and not complain or respond. As far as Russia is concerned we should be Buddha. For everyone else we are Rambo. Excellent Trump logic
47   Shaman   ignore (3)   2018 Jul 16, 10:39am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Russia is a foe.
Democrats are a failed party of full retardation, and are spitefully hating on Americans because our awesomeness makes them look that much worse.
Republicans are being transformed by the MAGA movement, and remain our only alternative to Democrat insanity.
49   TrumpingTits   ignore (3)   2018 Jul 17, 9:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Libtards: TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA!
Mueller after over a year: Nothingburger on that...but I have a bunch of nobodies indicted, pressured to confess for a plea bargain to distract you from that!

Dr. Ian Malcolm: Now eventually you might have dinosaurs on your, on your dinosaur tour, right? Hello? yes?

50   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 17, 10:38pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
the RNC was also hacked


If so, then I'll speculate what the hackers found:

"OMG Trump won another primary! Quick, someone figure out how to save JEB!"

Subsequent variations:

"OMG Trump won another primary! Quick, someone figure out how to save [insert name of remaining GOPe candidate here]."
51   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 17, 10:42pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Because it was boring and didn’t contain anything the world would even care about.


Assange basically said there was no difference between the few Trump emails he got, and what he said on the Campaign Trail.

Unlike the other candidate...
52   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 17, 10:44pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
Ah the old favor done by the thief (Russia). We should allow this thief to look into all our US state secrets and tell us if they find anything wrong. Actually, Trump is on it. He did so with the Russian foreign minister in the white house and now more secrets given to Russia at the Helsinki summit. Russia will go through all this and then let the US know if it did anything wrong. Thank you Russia.


2012: "Whoo Hoo. Man did Obama Zing Mittens with that 80s Policy Back! LOLZ! WRECKED! Russia isn't an enemy anymore, dumbass Repugs!"
2018: "B-B-B-But, Anderson Cooper says Obama's Communist Voting Intel Guy Brennan says Putin controls Trump! Russia, Russia, Russia! Don't you dumbass Repugs understand?"
53   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 17, 10:46pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

MrMagic says
We won't even touch on the FACT of idiot Podesta replying to a Phishing email and voluntarily giving his password on his Gmail account to some hacker.


Shh! That's the FSB's most sophisticated Hacking Procedure called by it's dangerous Russian term, "Phishing". Don't tell anybody!

Nevermind that the only person who should be falling for that shit after 2010 is Grandma and her still active Juno account.
54   FortWayne   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 17, 11:55pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Pretty much the only thing Russians did was setup a website and leaked out emails between Hillary and her staff, where DNC staffers were discussing how to lie, cheap, and manipulate elections to defeat Bernie Sanders.

If that is true, it doesn't sound like they did something bad here. This is like public service, and it cost us nothing! Yet another reason to allow Assange to come back and run his business freely here. We need more leaks like this!
55   FortWayne   ignore (4)   2018 Jul 18, 12:01am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Aphroman says
Cut taxes
Run up Debt
Blind Deregulation
Hate Blacks n Mexicans
Fuck the Constitution by putting religion before Country
Massive Govt waste spending on military
Play the victim, blame everything on liberals
Hate the Gays
Abortion front and center as if this were the 1950’s
Stupid and Dishonest


And now let's describe Democrats

Increase taxes
Run up debt anyway
Blind Deregulation and subsidies of rich friends in solar
Hate whites, asians, and especially men
Fuck the morality and religion by banning religion while promoting fags and transgender above all else
Fuck the poor by taking their money and giving it to unions and bureaucrats
Massive government spending on handouts
Play victim, and blame white men for everything
Demand reparations for some shit 200 years ago
Pretend Islam is religion of peace, while they are flying planes into Americans
Murder babies
Stupid and Dishonest
56   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 18, 12:48am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Thread topic: California

FortWayne says
lgbtq


Thread topic: capitalism

FortWayne says
homosexual


Thread topic: NRA

FortWayne says
lgbtq


Thread topic: names

FortWayne says
lgbt


Thread topic: Russian hacking

FortWayne says
fags


Not saying anything about another user, just quoting.
57   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 18, 6:14am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
If so, then I'll speculate what the hackers found:

"OMG Trump won another primary! Quick, someone figure out how to save JEB!"

Subsequent variations:

"OMG Trump won another primary! Quick, someone figure out how to save [insert name of remaining GOPe candidate here]."


I'm guessing it's more like:

"Here's how to funnel secret Soviet money through the NRA and into the RNC coffers"
58   Tim Aurora   ignore (1)   2018 Jul 18, 6:49am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

FortWayne says
Pretty much the only thing Russians did was setup a website and leaked out emails between Hillary and her staff, where DNC staffers were discussing how to lie, cheap, and manipulate elections to defeat Bernie Sanders.


Actually they did much more than that . So, we should let Russia go through our state secrets and decide where we messed up. Wait, Trump already did that.
59   BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2018 Jul 18, 7:04am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Isn't everybody? (Other than between 6 and 7am)
TrumpingTits says
Translation: You are full of crap
60   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Jul 18, 7:22am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
Actually they did much more than that

You know this how? Treasous Rosenteina nd Mueelar setting up those indictiments days before Trumps; visit to Russia-deep state and dems want a coup-theya re not even hiding their treaeonous behavior.
Pigs-no wonder they want to egt rid of the 2nd amendment-they know a coup won't be easy with an armed populace-the founding fathers were indeed wise.

So why does this so called impartial special counsel not investigate Hilalry paying perkins cole Russians to egt the dossier that ehy then used to obtain the FISAvwaarrant. Pigs-this country is in the throes of a coup-democrats are traitors who support the couip-but stupid fools don't realize they will eb the easy pickings for the police state.

Cambodia, soviet union , Chile all show what happens in a police state. This country is in danger. It ahs been for a while witht he "small" man being thrown in jail for stupid reasons-we are the most incarcerated nation on earth. Now the pig police state has decided to go after the president.
Thank God we have a President who fights back and may he take down the biggest mafia on earth down.

« First    « Previous    Comments 21 - 60 of 60    Last »


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions