« prev   random   next »

5
0

Poll finds Tulsi Gabbard won first debate in a Landslide!!!

By Quigley following x   2019 Jun 27, 9:49am 1,206 views   48 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    


45% bitches! Out of ten candidates! Runner up was Warren with 11%. And this was with her only getting 3 questions to a candidate average of 6, and at least two of those questions being poison pills. The moderators clearly were trying to sideline her, but she chose her moments to shine. I think people could see her genuine personality and passion for her country. It was a breath of fresh air compared to the posturing fools to her right and left.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/450597-drudge-instant-poll-shows-tulsi-gabbard-winning-first-democratic-debate-in

« First    « Previous    Comments 9 - 48 of 48    Last »

9   Onvacation   ignore (4)   2019 Jun 27, 11:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I think I may vote for her, at least in the primaries. Even though she's labeled democrat she is smart, well spoken, and has good ideas.
10   OccasionalCortex   ignore (3)   2019 Jun 27, 12:01pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Use L-O-G-I-C, people! :)

A) She's hot.

B) she pisses off her globalist elitist masters in the Dem Party by being anti-neocon warmonger...JUST LIKE TRUMP DOES TO THE GOP's ELITES (who are often the very same fuckers, btw).

C) She's hot.

D) She doesn't say whacko shit -- either in English or Spanish.

E) She's hot.

F) As mentioned earlier by @CBOEtrader, the media WILL crush her just like they try to do with Trump 24/7. She's way off the Globalist Democrat reservation as per observation (B).

G) She's hot.

H, I, J, K...every other one of those will be 'She's hot', just in case the pattern-recognition challenged of you haven't figured that out by now. :)

So what is there exactly that wouldn't appeal to a Trump supporter regarding these particular aspects of her?



11   HEYYOU   ignore (31)   2019 Jun 27, 12:30pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Thank God! We have another poll that elects the next President. I won't have to vote.
12   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Jun 27, 12:34pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Google has made themselves obsolete as any kind of Political analyzing tool.

You just can't in good faith use any trend they have on, any Political topic.

I take issue with Google inferring that all of the Southern States uniformly think Spartacus was the winner.
They are fighting for that Black South and I'll be damned if they'll let an outsider White Woman undo all of the work the DNC has done to the South in the decade.
13   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 27, 12:45pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I think even she is a nutjob.

Nothing can trigger a war with Iran? Really? What if they shoot one of our manned planes? What if they invade Kuwait, Bahrain or Attack Israel? Would that do it?

And then Gabbard said no one should tell anyone who to love or who to marry.

The US Federal govt has never told anyone who to love so that’s straight bs pandering nonsense. A feel good piece of fluff. As far as The Who to marry, clearly the fed govt really does have a say so in who people marry. Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents, or children, and polygamy is not allowed either. So her statement in that regard is fly out false. Again, low level pandering with a mostly nonsensical statement.
14   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 12:47pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says
polygamy is not allowed either

Our polyamorous citizens are discriminated against! How can government decree that love is only between two humans, and not between a group of 21717???
15   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 12:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CovfefeButDeadly says
Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.
16   RC2006   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 12:57pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
CovfefeButDeadly says
Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.
17   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 1:01pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RC2006 says
d6rB says
CovfefeButDeadly says
Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.


Yep, including pedophilia.
18   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 1:04pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RC2006 says

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness. Strictly speaking, either we define marriage in a narrow fashion (according to our culture and traditions), and it is marriage of a man and a woman, or we can broaden the definition of marriage. If we broaden the definition to anything other than man and woman by arguing that "adults should not be limited in their choices and whom they love etc" then there is absolutely no logical reason to restrict marriage to two people, or to not allow seven brothers marry their sister, etc. They are adults and should be able to live without discrimination, right?

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.
19   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 27, 1:28pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.


That’s the libertarian view and the natural progression of the liberal view. Not to mention the fairest and most equitable point of view. The fact that not one candidate last night even faintly alluded to such tells you all you need to know about the Democrats.

There were no liberals...not a one. They are all leftists, happily willing to infringe on your individual freedoms
20   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 27, 2:20pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.


Yeah, I've never understood the "marriage rights" issue. Fighting for tax breaks and responsibility for your ex's lifestyle post breakup, ok.
21   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jun 27, 3:27pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

She's insane if she thinks she can run without advocating tax cuts and disbandment of the SEC.
22   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 27, 5:10pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says
Use L-O-G-I-C, people! :)

A) She's hot.


She a D you can D
23   mell   ignore (2)   2019 Jun 27, 5:31pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
RC2006 says

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness. Strictly speaking, either we define marriage in a narrow fashion (according to our culture and traditions), and it is marriage of a man and a woman, or we can broaden the definition of marriage. If we broaden the definition to anything other than man and woman by arguing that "adults should not be limited in their choices and whom they love etc" then there is absolutely no logical reason to restrict marriage to two people, or to not allow seven brothers marry their sister, etc. They are adults and should be able to live without discrimination, right?

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.


You'd have to get out of the business altogether as multiple wives create a health and social benefits conundrum that's close to impossible to solve. In a way feminist womyn and gay couples screw up marriage already as they are less stable and have less kids so the government does not benefit from them.
24   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 27, 5:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness.


Polyamory is already happening.
https://www.bobcutmag.com/stories/polyamory-in-sf

The last desperate phase of the Middle Upper Class Feminists in San Francisco will be to demand open marriages, so they get both their HAWT GUY and the breadwinner. The Beta Breadwinner won't be allowed to complain because he'll get occasional second-rate fuck buddy sex while main partner is in between Hawt Guys, and besides he can see other women.

Interestingly, this won't work for long given the increasing gap between college educated men and women.

As men, our main interests should be limiting refugees/migrants but using feminist "concerns" to insure that (young) women are over-represented in immigration.
"Women suffer the most in war so 80% of Syrian migrants should solely consist of young women"
25   Onvacation   ignore (4)   2019 Jun 27, 7:00pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says


Wasn't Oklahoma "Indian Country".
26   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 27, 8:16pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Onvacation says
OccasionalCortex says


Wasn't Oklahoma "Indian Country".


Lol, spot on. OK has the largest % of natives in the country, though I think CA has more by pure numbers.
27   WookieMan   ignore (3)   2019 Jun 27, 9:08pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OccasionalCortex says
A) She's hot.


While she's the most attractive female candidate I've seen from the Dems, hot is a bit over the top. Probably a 6, maybe pushing a 7. Let's call it a 6.5.

Our resident crypto queer would probably call her "cute" and not hot. Tulsi and crypto spam would probably love to have a White Claw together while pumping out lavender essential oils all purchased with dollars.

Sorry, cross posting in a way. Stupidity needs to be stopped though.
28   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jun 28, 8:28am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The important question which should be asked at every debate is TULSI!, ARE! YOU! WET! ?
29   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 28, 8:34am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Have you noticed noone from CNN/CNBC will even discuss her, let alone give her credit?

Ignoring a threat is the first stage of propaganda.

Also interesting to note the OP's poll is from drudge. TG is the candidate w the most independent appeal, but I think the D's want the free-shit, warmonger clowns.

Sad.
30   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jun 28, 8:51am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

What was bizarre about the last run through was IHLary's instigation of a Libyan coup and the dissolution of the country's governance, however bizarre and corrupt THAT NO ONE DISCUSSED!

Ford had the sense to understand we have a State Department. We have an an Army and laws to declare war. Ad hoc assassinations just take a massive shit on all of that and no one thinks it's worth condemning IHLary and Her Pet President over?
31   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 28, 9:03am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

This is a beautiful thing:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-17/tulsi-gabbard-slams-trump-making-us-prostitute-saudi-arabia

The Hawaiian congresswomen and outspoken US foreign policy critic asserted the president is turning the nation “into the prostitute of Saudi Arabia” and further stated he vetoed the bill “to please his Saudi masters” in a minute-and-a-half campaign video.

"Unlike Donald Trump I will not turn our great country into the prostitute of Saudi Arabia."


I love Tulsi!
32   Tenpoundbass   ignore (14)   2019 Jun 28, 9:05am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.
33   PeopleUnited   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 28, 9:10am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's the Saudi Zionist axis TPB! Truth be told Trump is nobody's puppet. It is too bad he doesn't call the saudis out for what they are, on the other hand other than Tulsi and Ron Paul, what real politician can you count on not to pander to the Saudis? Certainly not Obama/Clinton/Biden/NPC's
34   HonkpilledMaster   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 29, 6:13pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says
The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.


Yep, the Russo-Hezbollah-Mullah line:

Trump is controlled by Zionist-Wahabis.

Only if you agree with the Czar Ayatollah are you "woke".
35   EBGuy   ignore (0)   2019 Jun 29, 6:43pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tulsi is insane. She goes on Rogan, Jimmy Dore, AND Tucker's show. The future is certainly going to be interesting...
36   Ceffer   ignore (2)   2019 Jun 29, 8:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says
The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.

You have something against equal opportunity conspiracy theorists?
37   rdm   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 29, 9:09pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

So an instant poll on Drudge gives her the win. Ha Ha. All that proves is there is no way in hell she can ever get the nomination being the favorite of Drudge participants who don't vote in Democratic primaries and probably will vote 95% for Trump. But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.
38   just_dregalicious   ignore (0)   2019 Jun 29, 10:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

EBGuy says
Tulsi is insane. She goes on Rogan, Jimmy Dore, AND Tucker's show. The future is certainly going to be interesting...


Yeah funny that she was the only one who appeared sane, cool and collected among the clowns. That and people just want to fuck her. So I'm wondering if she's really all that great.

I feel a bit obliged to at least check her out on Rogan so I know what she's about.
39   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Jun 30, 4:26am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'd rather she blow me. Call me weird just_dregalicious says
That and people just want to fuck her.
40   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jun 30, 4:36am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I need to bite her bum!
41   Automan Empire   ignore (2)   2019 Jun 30, 7:00am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
I need to bite her bum!


Get in line buddy! As a consummate Ass Man, I saw it first.
42   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 30, 11:07am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rdm says
But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.

Yes, lets hope that either Creepy Joe or Bankster Whore Kamala gets nominated. That nearly guarantees election of tRUMP...
43   mell   ignore (2)   2019 Jun 30, 12:20pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
rdm says
But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.

Yes, lets hope that either Creepy Joe or Bankster Whore Kamala gets nominated. That nearly guarantees election of tRUMP...


What cult? She wasn't raised in a cult. Also Trump voters are the least cultists. Many are swing voters or ex Dems or minorities. Beating this dead and false horse is boring. Politically Trump voters are the most diverse. You want a cult look no further than to the Dems where everyone needs to raise their hand for free handouts to illegals or be ostracized.
44   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jun 30, 12:28pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

mell says
She wasn't raised in a cult.

I did not understand this either. What cult? Perhaps the biggest cult of all is the ORANGEMANBAD cult
45   just_dregalicious   ignore (0)   2019 Jun 30, 3:42pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CBOEtrader says
I'd rather she blow me. Call me weird just_dregalicious says
That and people just want to fuck her.


Not weird at all. If she had green eyes, smooth skin and was much younger she'd look like a Veronica I banged in high school.

Once.

Veronica had a single long black areola hair that freaked me out.
46   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (41)   2019 Jul 1, 4:58am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Automan Empire says
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
I need to bite her bum!


Get in line buddy! As a consummate Ass Man, I saw it first.


Tulsi needs my teeth to validate her candidacy!

She knows this!

She wants this!
47   rdm   ignore (1)   2019 Jul 1, 9:15am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

d6rB says
She wasn't raised in a cult


Try a little research, an off shoot of the Hare Krishnas. I have nothing against her including this, it's just amusing that Trump cultists would gravitate toward her. Someone who 1. will almost certainly never get the Dem nomination and 2. Would be easy fodder for devastating opo research should by some miracle she was on the ticket.
48   6rdB   ignore (1)   2019 Jul 1, 9:32am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rdm says
Try a little research, an off shoot of the Hare Krishnas.


Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, the first Hindu to join either chamber of Congress, used the sacred text from her faith in a ceremonial swearing-in conducted by Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio).

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tulsi-gabbard-hindu-bhagavad-gita-swearing-in_n_2410078

I do not think that Hindu qualifies as a cult. More specifically, she follows Gaudiya Vaishnavism which is a Vaishnava religious movement inspired by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (1486–1534) in India. This appears to be fairly mainstream Hinduism.

Even if her parents were Hare Krishnas, I fail to see why you have to trash her because of that.

rdm says
it's just amusing that Trump cultists would gravitate toward her.

Because every single one of all other D candidates represent "business as usual" (may be with exception of Yang). I personally mildly dislike tRUMP and would be very happy if we would get a better alternative. Appears we will not, and we will get a choice of Mr Creep and bankster Whore who will handsomely lose to our Orangemanbad.

« First    « Previous    Comments 9 - 48 of 48    Last »


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions